Opposing the cruelties of factory farming is not an all-or-nothing proposition. From eating more meat-free meals to going vegetarian or vegan, we can all help create a better world through our everyday choices.
What we choose to eat makes a powerful statement about whom we are. Actions speak louder than words and making ethical, compassionate choices affirms our fundamental humanity.
Much as we have awakened to the full economic and social costs of cigarettes, we will find we can no longer ignore the costs of mass-producing cattle, poultry, pigs, sheep, and fish to feed our growing population.
These costs include hugely inefficient use of freshwater and land, heavy pollution from livestock feces, rising rates of which much of our planet’s life depends.
With rising temperatures, rising sea levels, melting icecaps and glaciers, shifting ocean currents and weather patterns, climate change is the most serious challenge facing the human race.
It is all very well to say that individuals must wrestle with their consciousness, but only if their consciousness are awake and informed. Industrial society, unfortunately, hides animal suffering.
When we picture a farm, visions of “Old MacDonald’s” come to mind, not the warehouses with 10,000 chickens.
When we look, it’s shocking, as our childhood pictures have been transformed into stinking factories.
Visiting a confined animal feeding operation is to enter a world designed according to macabre principals; animals are machines incapable of feeling pain.
Since no thinking person can possibly believe this anymore, industrial animal agriculture depends upon a suspension of disbelief on the part of the people who operate it and a willingness to avert your eyes and your innate feeling of compassion.
Our own worst nightmare may be such a place. But it is real life for billions of animals unlucky enough to have been born under these impersonal steel roofs, into the brief, pitiless life of a “production unit”.
Virtually all U.S. birds raised for food are factory farmed. Inside densely populated sheds, vast amounts of waste accumulate.
The resultant ammonia levels commonly cause painful burns to the birds’ eyes and respiratory tracts.
To cut losses from birds pecking each other, farmers remove a third to a half of the beak from egg-laying hens, breeding chickens, and most turkeys and ducks. The birds suffer pain for weeks.
If most urban meat eaters were to visit an industrial broiler house, to see how the birds are raised, and could see would not be impressed and many would swear off eating chicken and maybe all other flesh as well.
For modern animal agriculture, the less the consumer knows about what’s happening before it winds up on their plate, the better. If this is true, is this then an ethical situation?
And, should we be reluctant to let people know what really goes on, because we’re not really proud of it and concerned that it might turn them to vegetarianism?
When we talk about flesh that is “free-range”, does anyone realize that the exposure to the outdoors by these creatures may amount to one small exit in an over-crowed shed, as there are no USDA requirements for indoor or outdoor space? So, if the door is open, these animals can be labeled “free-range”.
Packed in battery cages, typically less than half a square foot of floor space per bird, hens can become immobilized and die of asphyxiation or dehydration. Decomposing corpses are routinely found in cages with live birds.
Though each hen is less productive when crowded, the operation as a whole makes more money with a high shocking density: chickens are cheap, cages are expensive.
By the time their egg production declines, the hens’ skeletons are so fragile that many suffer broken bones as they are removed from the cages.
Some flocks are gassed on-site and those sent to slaughter often endure long journeys and sustain further injuries.
The American laying hen passes her brief life span piled together with a half-dozen other hens in a wire cage whose floor is the size of a magazine page.
Every natural instinct of this animal is cut-off, leading to a range of behavioral “vices” that can include cannibalizing her cage mates and rubbing her body against the wire mesh until it is featherless and bloody.
The 5% or so of hens that cannot bear it and simply die are built into the cost of production.
Birds with broken legs and wings, open wounds, and large tumors are shackled and hung on the slaughter line, while some of the birds are left writhing on the floor for hours beforehand.
Workers punch, kick, throw, and mutilate live birds; eggs are ripped out of the birds’ bodies and thrown at co-workers, and the heads of the birds are ripped off the birds that were trapped inside the transport cages.
Contrary to popular belief, chickens are not mindless, simple automations, but are complex behaviorally, do quite well in learning, show a rich social organization, and have a diverse repertoire of calls.
Anyone who has kept barnyard chickens recognizes their significant differences in personality.
What about the “little piggy that went to market”? Well, these piglets in confinement operations are weaned from their mothers 2 to 3 weeks after birth compared with 13 weeks in nature because they gain weight faster on their hormone, antibiotic, fortified feed. This premature weaning leaves the pigs with a lifelong craving to of them.
The USDA’s recommended solution to the problem is called “tail docking”. Using a pair of pliers, without any anesthetic, most but not all of the tail is snipped off.
Why leave the little stump? Because the whole point of the exercise is not to remove the object of tail-biting so much as to render it more sensitive.
Now, a bite on the tail is so painful that even the most demoralized pig will mount a struggle to avoid it.
At this point you might think it can’t get any worse. Think again!
Pregnant pigs were confined in two-foot wide stalls, only able to take one step forward or back. Many of these pigs have deep infected sores and scrapes from constantly rubbing against the metal bars.
Workers clip the piglets’ tails with dull pliers; perform castrations, rip out the piglets’ testes with their hands; and tattoo sows by repeatedly driving a spiked mallet into the pigs flesh, again, all without anesthesia.
If the anti-cruelty laws that protect pets were applied to farmed animals, many of the routine U.S. farming practices would be illegal in all 50 states.
Are dogs and cats really so different from chickens, turkeys, pigs and cows that one group deserves legal protection from cruelty, while the other deserves virtually no protection at all?
Disregard for farmed animals persists because few people realize the ways in which these creatures are mistreated, and even fewer actually witness the abuse.
Once aware, most people are appalled – not because they believe in animal rights, but because they believe that animals feel pain and that morally decent human beings should try to prevent pain whenever possible.
Do we, as humans, having an ability to reason and to communicate abstract ideas verbally and in writing, and to form ethical and moral judgments using the accumulated knowledge of the ages, have the right to take the lives of other sentient beings when we are not forced to do so by hunger or dietary need, but rather do so for the somewhat callous reason that we like the taste of flesh and blood?
In Hawaii, the House Finance Committee unanimously passed a bill that would allow Hawaii to construct, maintain and run the only State owned slaughterhouse in the United States.
Despite a dozen protest testimonies and despite over 300 written protest testimonies, ignorance prevailed.
While testimonies were being given, those testimonies were constantly met with the words, “let’s summarize now” or “speed things up” or “there’s a 3 minute limit”.
Yet, when the Hawaii Dep’t of Agriculture Head, Russell Kokubun, spoke, the Legislators held on to his every word.
All this coming from the guy that is a front man for the special interest groups like Monsanto. Mr. Kokubun single handedly killed the GMO labeling bill.
This bill was actually the brainchild of the Cattlemen’s Association.
But, not wanting to assume any responsibility for the disastrous ramifications regarding environmental destruction or loss to life and limb, which is typical in a slaughterhouse, their paid lobbyist successfully convinced our lolo (nut case) politicians that they should foot the bill of construction - $1.9 million. And once again Hawaii remains in first place as the per capita champion of the colon-cancer capitol of the world.
What do we do to try to instill compassion in humans? How do we get them to realize what they eat is the result of immense cruelty, torture and pain?
Even more important is how do we wean people away from their insatiable addiction to the flesh and blood of rotting animals?
Compassion begins in one’s heart.
If the heart is hard, compassion will not be present. If the heart is soft, compassion for all living beings will abound.
There is a very interesting point made in various Eastern scriptures about animal slaughter and its future effects on the consumers aka karma.
Granted there will be many to deny this but usually the deniers are the ones entrenched in their behaviors.
The ancient scriptures state that for every hair on the animal’s back, those involved from the raiser of the creature down to the person that washes the dish the flesh was on have to take birth in a body like the one that was slaughtered.
So, while in a human form, which is the ultimate gift of the soul’s evolution, it is the only form in which the driver of the vehicle, the soul, can make a choice. All the lower forms are governed by the laws of nature and bear no karma. They simply evolve until reaching the human form.
Once there, one of two things happen: One will endeavor for as much sense gratification as possible or somehow one will embark upon a spiritual path endeavoring to follow God’s instructions.
Doing the former leads to another material body with no guarantees on it being a human form. Doing the latter will start a purification process and insure a future human form allowing that soul to pick up where he left off spiritually until he finally goes home to the spiritual world and never has to come back to the material world again.
Yeah, yeah, reincarnation can be accepted or rejected. But the truth is the truth and we all know that the truth will set us free..