The Plot to Control and Reduce the Population 3
Some time ago, on my radio show, I talked about Dr. Richard Day coming out and speaking about population control and reduction. Dr. Day did this in 1969. Some of the points he made to attain that goal are coming to fruition.
Is there a power, a force or a group of men organizing and redirecting change?
Some time ago, on my radio show, I talked about Dr. Richard Day coming out and speaking about population control and reduction. Dr. Day did this in 1969. Some of the points he made to attain that goal are coming to fruition.
Is there a power, a force or a group of men organizing and redirecting change?
There has been much written, and much said, by some people who have looked at all the changes that have occurred in American society in the past 75 years or so, and who have looked retrospectively to earlier history of the United States, and indeed, of the world, and come to the conclusion that there is a conspiracy of sorts which influences, indeed controls. major historical events, not only in the United States, but around the world.
This conspiratorial interpretation of history is based on people making observations from the outside, gathering evidence and coming to the conclusion that from the outside they see a conspiracy. Their evidence and conclusions are based on evidence gathered in retrospect. Period. I want to now describe what was said in 1969.
Dr. Day did not speak in terms of retrospect, but rather predicted changes that would be brought about in the future. He was not looking from the outside in, thinking that he saw conspiracy, rather, he was on the inside, admitting that, indeed, there was an organized power, force, group of men, who wielded enough influence to determine major events involving countries around the world. And he predicted, or rather expounded on, changes that were planned for the remainder of this century.
Some of the things that were discussed were not intended to be accomplished before the end of this century. There is a timetable; and it was during this session that some of the elements of the timetable were brought out.
Anyone who recalls early in the days of the Kennedy Presidency, the Kennedy campaign, when he spoke of progress in the decade of the 60’s that was kind of a cliché in those days. Well, by 1969 Day was talking about the decade of the 70's, the decade of the 80's, and the decade of the 90's. So that the terminology that we are looking at, looking at things and expressing things, probably all comes from the same source.
Prior to that time nobody referred to the decade of the 40's or the decade of the 50's. So, this overall plan and timetable had taken important shape with more predictability to those who control it, sometime in the late 50's.
Day’s purpose was to tell us about changes which would be brought about in the next 30 years or so...so that an entirely new world-wide system would be in operation before the turn of the century. As he put it, "We plan to enter the 21st Century with a running start."
"EVERYTHING IS IN PLACE AND NOBODY CAN STOP US NOW..."
He said, "Some of you will think I'm talking about Communism. Well, what I'm talking about is much bigger than Communism!"
At that time, he indicated that there is much more cooperation between East and West than most people realize. In his introductory remarks he commented that he was free to speak at this time. He would not have been able to say what he was about to say, even a few years earlier. But he was free to speak at this time because now, "everything is in place and nobody can stop us now."
He went on to say that most people don't understand how governments operate and even people in high positions in governments, including our own, don't really understand how and where decisions are made. He went on to say that people who really influence decisions are names that for the most part would be familiar to most of us, but he would not use individuals' names or names of any specific organization. But, if he did, most of the people would be names that were recognized by most of his audience. He went on to say that they were not primarily people in public office, but people of prominence who were primarily known in their private occupations or private positions.
Day was an MD and a former professor at a large Eastern university, and he was addressing a group of doctors of medicine, about 80 in number. His purpose in telling the group about the imminent changes that were to be brought about was to make it easier for .them to adapt to these changes.
"PEOPLE WILL HAVE TO GET USED TO CHANGE..."
Somewhere in his introductory remarks he insisted that nobody have a tape recorder and that nobody take notes, which for a professor was a very remarkable kind of thing to expect from an audience. Something in his remarks suggested that there could be negative repercussions against him if it became widely known what he was about to say. Nonetheless, he asked that no notes be taken and no tape recordings be used.
As his remarks began to unfold, and the outrageous things that were said, he emphasized that people will have to get used to the idea of change, that they'll be expecting change.
He said nothing will be permanent and this came out in the context of a society where people seemed to have no roots or moorings, but would be passively willing to accept change simply because it was all they had ever known.
This was sort of in contrast to generations of people up until this time where certain things you expected to be, and remain in place as reference points for your life. So change was to be brought about, change was to be anticipated and expected, and accepted, no questions asked.
Another comment that was made was that people are too trusting and don't ask the right questions.
Being too trusting was equated with being too dumb. But sometimes when people don't ask the right questions, they deserve what they get.
THE REAL AND THE STATED GOALS
Another comment that was repeated from time to time, in relation to changing laws and customs and specific changes, he said that everything has two purposes. One is the ostensible purpose, which will make it acceptable to people and second is the real purpose which would further the goals of establishing the new system and having it.
POPULATION CONTROL
He was very active with population control groups, the population control movement, and population control was really the entry point into specifics following the introduction. He said the population is growing too fast.
Numbers of people living at any one time on the planet must be limited or we will run out of space to live. We will outgrow our food supply and we will over-populate the world with our waste.
PERMISSION TO HAVE BABIES
People won't be allowed to have babies just because they want to or because they are careless. Most families would be limited to two. Some people would be allowed only one, and the outstanding person or persons might be selected and allowed to have three.
But most people would be allowed to have only two babies. That's because the zero population growth rate is 2.1 children per completed family. So something like every 10th family might be allowed the privilege of the third baby.
The word "population control primarily connoted limiting the number of babies to be born. But this remark about what people would be "allowed" and then what followed, made it quite clear that when you hear "population control" that means more than just controlling births. It means control of every endeavor of an entire world population
Sources:
www.thealternativecolumn.com
www.reddit.com
This conspiratorial interpretation of history is based on people making observations from the outside, gathering evidence and coming to the conclusion that from the outside they see a conspiracy. Their evidence and conclusions are based on evidence gathered in retrospect. Period. I want to now describe what was said in 1969.
Dr. Day did not speak in terms of retrospect, but rather predicted changes that would be brought about in the future. He was not looking from the outside in, thinking that he saw conspiracy, rather, he was on the inside, admitting that, indeed, there was an organized power, force, group of men, who wielded enough influence to determine major events involving countries around the world. And he predicted, or rather expounded on, changes that were planned for the remainder of this century.
Some of the things that were discussed were not intended to be accomplished before the end of this century. There is a timetable; and it was during this session that some of the elements of the timetable were brought out.
Anyone who recalls early in the days of the Kennedy Presidency, the Kennedy campaign, when he spoke of progress in the decade of the 60’s that was kind of a cliché in those days. Well, by 1969 Day was talking about the decade of the 70's, the decade of the 80's, and the decade of the 90's. So that the terminology that we are looking at, looking at things and expressing things, probably all comes from the same source.
Prior to that time nobody referred to the decade of the 40's or the decade of the 50's. So, this overall plan and timetable had taken important shape with more predictability to those who control it, sometime in the late 50's.
Day’s purpose was to tell us about changes which would be brought about in the next 30 years or so...so that an entirely new world-wide system would be in operation before the turn of the century. As he put it, "We plan to enter the 21st Century with a running start."
"EVERYTHING IS IN PLACE AND NOBODY CAN STOP US NOW..."
He said, "Some of you will think I'm talking about Communism. Well, what I'm talking about is much bigger than Communism!"
At that time, he indicated that there is much more cooperation between East and West than most people realize. In his introductory remarks he commented that he was free to speak at this time. He would not have been able to say what he was about to say, even a few years earlier. But he was free to speak at this time because now, "everything is in place and nobody can stop us now."
He went on to say that most people don't understand how governments operate and even people in high positions in governments, including our own, don't really understand how and where decisions are made. He went on to say that people who really influence decisions are names that for the most part would be familiar to most of us, but he would not use individuals' names or names of any specific organization. But, if he did, most of the people would be names that were recognized by most of his audience. He went on to say that they were not primarily people in public office, but people of prominence who were primarily known in their private occupations or private positions.
Day was an MD and a former professor at a large Eastern university, and he was addressing a group of doctors of medicine, about 80 in number. His purpose in telling the group about the imminent changes that were to be brought about was to make it easier for .them to adapt to these changes.
"PEOPLE WILL HAVE TO GET USED TO CHANGE..."
Somewhere in his introductory remarks he insisted that nobody have a tape recorder and that nobody take notes, which for a professor was a very remarkable kind of thing to expect from an audience. Something in his remarks suggested that there could be negative repercussions against him if it became widely known what he was about to say. Nonetheless, he asked that no notes be taken and no tape recordings be used.
As his remarks began to unfold, and the outrageous things that were said, he emphasized that people will have to get used to the idea of change, that they'll be expecting change.
He said nothing will be permanent and this came out in the context of a society where people seemed to have no roots or moorings, but would be passively willing to accept change simply because it was all they had ever known.
This was sort of in contrast to generations of people up until this time where certain things you expected to be, and remain in place as reference points for your life. So change was to be brought about, change was to be anticipated and expected, and accepted, no questions asked.
Another comment that was made was that people are too trusting and don't ask the right questions.
Being too trusting was equated with being too dumb. But sometimes when people don't ask the right questions, they deserve what they get.
THE REAL AND THE STATED GOALS
Another comment that was repeated from time to time, in relation to changing laws and customs and specific changes, he said that everything has two purposes. One is the ostensible purpose, which will make it acceptable to people and second is the real purpose which would further the goals of establishing the new system and having it.
POPULATION CONTROL
He was very active with population control groups, the population control movement, and population control was really the entry point into specifics following the introduction. He said the population is growing too fast.
Numbers of people living at any one time on the planet must be limited or we will run out of space to live. We will outgrow our food supply and we will over-populate the world with our waste.
PERMISSION TO HAVE BABIES
People won't be allowed to have babies just because they want to or because they are careless. Most families would be limited to two. Some people would be allowed only one, and the outstanding person or persons might be selected and allowed to have three.
But most people would be allowed to have only two babies. That's because the zero population growth rate is 2.1 children per completed family. So something like every 10th family might be allowed the privilege of the third baby.
The word "population control primarily connoted limiting the number of babies to be born. But this remark about what people would be "allowed" and then what followed, made it quite clear that when you hear "population control" that means more than just controlling births. It means control of every endeavor of an entire world population
Sources:
www.thealternativecolumn.com
www.reddit.com
RSS Feed